Newspaper Archive of
The Adams County Record
Council, Idaho
Lyft
March 22, 2012     The Adams County Record
PAGE 8     (8 of 18 available)        PREVIOUS     NEXT      Full Size Image
 
PAGE 8     (8 of 18 available)        PREVIOUS     NEXT      Full Size Image
March 22, 2012
 

Newspaper Archive of The Adams County Record produced by SmallTownPapers, Inc.
Website © 2019. All content copyrighted. Copyright Information.     Terms Of Use.     Request Content Removal.




r Page 8 Wednesday, March 21, 2012 The Adams County Record EXERCISE YOUR RIGHT TO KNOW : READ THE LEGALS Please submit legal notices to legals@theadamscountyrecord.com LEGAL NOTICE NOTICE OF TRUSTEE'S SALE: The following described property will be sold at pub- lic auction to the highest bidder, payable in lawful money of the United States, the offic~ of Timberline Title & Escrow, 104 industrial Avenue, Council, ID, 83612, on 07/06/2012 at 11:00 AM, (recognized local time) for the purpose of foreclosing that certain Deed of Trust recorded 03/21/2006 as Instrument Number 111339, and executed by KORRI D HOGAN AND SCOTT HOGAN, as Grantor(s), in favor of BANK OF AMERICA, N.A,, as Beneficiary, to RECONTRUST COMPANY, N.A., the Current Trustee of record, covering the following real property located in Adams County, State of Idaho: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 22, BLOCK 1, TAMARACK VIEW ESTATES PHASE I, ADAMS COUNTY, IDAHO, AS SAID LOT AND BLOCK ARE NUMBERED AND DESIGNATED UPON THE OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF ON FILE IN THE ADAMS COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE, RECORDED JANUARY 31, 2006 AS INSTR. NO. 110967 IN BOOK 3 OF PLATS PAGE 13. The Trustee has no knowledge of a more particular description of the above referenced real property, but for purpose of compliance with Idaho Code, Section 60-113, the Trustee has been informed that the street address of, LOT 22 RIM ROAD, New Meadows, ID, 83654 is sometimes associated with said real property. Bidders must be prepared to tender the trustee the full amount of the bid at the sale in the form of cash, or a cashier's check drawn on a state or feder- ally insured savings institution. Said sale will be made without covenant or warranty, express or implied, regarding title, possession or encumbrances to satisfy the obliga- tion secured by and pursuant to the power of sale conferred in that certain Deed of Trust. The default for which this sale is to be made is: Failure to pay the monthly payment due 11/01/2011 of principal, interest and impounds and subsequent install- ments due thereafter; plus late charges, with interest currently accruing at 3.125% per annum; together with all subsequent sums advanced by beneficiary pursuant to the terms and conditions of said Deed of Trust, and any supplemental modifications thereto. The principal balance owing as of this date on said obligation is $83,867.46, plus interest, costs and expenses actually incurred in enforcing the obligations there- under and in this sale, together with any unpaid and/or accruing real property taxes, and/or assessments, attorneys' fees, Trustees' fees and costs, and any other amount advanced to protect said security, as authorized in the promissory note secured by the aforementioned Deed of Trust. Therefore, the Beneficiary elects to sell, or cause said trust property to be sold. to satisfy said obligation. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THIS FIRM IS ATI'EMPTING TO COLLECT A DEBT AND ANY INFORMATION OBTAINED WILL BE USED FOR THAT PURPOSE, AND THAT THE DEBT MAY BE DISPUTED. THE ABOVE GRANTORS ARE NAMED TO COMPLY WITH SECTION 45-1506(4}(a) IDAHO CODE. NO REPRESENTATION IS MADE THAT THEY ARE, OR ARE NOT, PRESENTLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS OBLIGATION. DATED: 02/28/2012, RECONTRUST COMPANY, N.A., Name and Address of the Current Trustee is: RECONTRUST COMPANY, N.A., 1800 Tapo Canyon Rd., CA6-914-01-94, SIMI VALLEY, CA 80028-1821, PHONE: (800) 281-8219 TS # 12-0012466 FEI # 1006.154566 Published in the Adams County Record on March 21, 2012 * March 28, 2012 April 04, 2012 * April 1 I, 2012 LEGAL NOTICE Notice is here by given that the Sorenson Rhinehart Ditch will hold the annual share- holders meeting March 26. 2012 at the Adams County Courthouse at :2K.0__0__p_~. The purpose of the shareholders meeting will be to elect directors for the year. The elected directors will set share assessments and conduct other business on the agenda pertaining to the management of the Sorenson Rinehart Ditch. Agenda may also include closed executive session. Mary_ Dickinson Secretary Published in the Adams County Record on March 07, 2012 * March 14, 2012 * March 21, 2012 Adams County Commissioners Catching Up With Flood Damage by Lee Buy Weed Department Supervisor Dave Klaw has worked on fulfilling the new EPA require- ments for weed spraying in the county near water sources. Klaw present- ed the Commissioners with three agreements that will provide up to $58,000 in funding for weed control in the coun- ty in 2012. The Bureau of Land Management is renewing a contract worth up to $9,000, and the Forest Service is renewing a five year agreement worth about $7,000 each year. The State of Idaho agreed to extend their cost sharing for another year, which resulted in $42,000 in 2011 and could be more in 2012. Klaw has worked to smooth out spending the stimulus funds over several sea- sons but must complete using them up by 2013. Road and Bridge Supervisor Tom Glenn reported that the por- tion of road being rebuilt aboveGoodrich Creek should be known as Wilson Road. Commission Chairman Bill Brown reported on his negotiations with the landowners who will be selling a new right of way for the rebuilt portion of this road. Flood waters in June, 2010, washed out the roadbed and made it necessary to move the road out of the creek bed. Supervisor Glenn will be advertising for construc- tion bids for rebuilding the bridge over Goodrich Creek during 2012. Heavy rains over the past week caused some major flooding to occur in the county, and in partic- ular inside New Meadows city limits. Mayor Julie Spelman from New Meadows appeared to discuss how the county can help divert runoff waters around the city. Most of the City of New Meadows is built in a flood plain, and rapid runoff has caused flood- ing several times in the past. Chairman Bill Brown authorized con- structing a dike at the south end of town and locating a larger cul- vert to divert Big Creek around the town. Road and Bridge issues dominated most of the meeting this week. The Department will close off South Grey's Creek Road until it can dry out some. Several areas of Grey's Creek Road will be scheduled for repav- ing later this year. The Commissioners request- ed that Supervisor Glenn prepare a list of roads that need sched- uled over-lays within the next couple of years. The Commissioners also asked Glenn to layout angled park- ing on the West side of the Courthouse and to repaint the parking lot dividers. Sheriff Rich Green reported that the State of Idaho Fish and Game Department has changed their policies regarding having the local sheriffs hold evidence, particu- larly guns, while waiting for trials. Fish and Game will now hold their own evidence and will collect revenue when confiscat- ed items are sold within the county. Chairman Brown suggested to Sheriff Green that the department develop and publish written proce- dures on handling adver- tising and sales of guns seized in criminal inves- tigations. During the Monday meeting, County Treasurer Connie Kesler presented a ietter announcing her pending retirement for May 31, 2012. Treasurer Kesler has held the office for thirty-two years. by Dale Fisk on Monday night, the After the Planning members gathered in and Zoning meeting the break room at the Ferrel Crossley (far right) reads a card he received [ from fellow members of the Adams County Planning [ and Zoning Council as the group gathered for a fare-] well celebration. ] courthouse to share a piece of cake and wish Ferrel Crossley a happy retirement from their group; Ferrel has served on the Planning and Zoning Council for about 29 years, having starting there in 1983. Don Horton recalls how he depended on Ferret's experience when he first started on the council. The remaining members are Donna Campbell, Jeff Batten, Micki Eby, Bill Shore, Jerry Lee, Brad Dreyer, Don Horton, Pare Murphy, Christy Ward and Penny Fisk. LEGAL NOTICE Help Wanted Council School District No. 13 is accepting applications for a girls' varsity basketball coach and a girls' junior varsity basketball coach for the 2012/2013 school year. Applications may be picked up at the district office in the high school during normal business hours, may be requested by mail at P.O, Box 468, Council, ID, 83612, by e-mail to clakey@csdl3.org, or by phone at 253-4217. Completed applications should be turned in to the district office during normal business hours by 4:00 p.m. on Friday, April 6, 2012. Council School District No. 13 is an Equal Opportunity Employer. Published in the Adams County Record on March 21, 2012 * March 28, 2012 i LEGAL NOTICE SUMMONS by Publication TO: JEREMIAH BASS-~ You have been sued by JAMIE L. WEIDNER, the Defendant, in the District Court in and for Gem County, Idaho, Case No. CV-2002-00778 CV-2002-00788. The nature of the claim against you is for modification of custody and support. Any time after 20 days following the last publication of this Summons, the court may enter a judgement against you without further notice, unless prior to that time you have filed a written response in the proper form, including the case num- ber, and paid any required tiling fee to the Clerk of the Court at 415 E. Main Street, Emmett, Idaho 83617, and served a copy of your response on the Defendant, whose mailing address and telephone number are JAMIE L. WEIDNER, 6135 N. Riverglen Place, Garden City, Idaho 83714, 208-703-6678. A Copy of the Notice and Petition for Modification can be obtained by contact- ing either the Clerk of the Court or the plaintiff. If you wish legal asistance, you should immediately retain an attorney to advise you on this matter. DATED this 5th day of M~_._M__~h___, 2012. :. Shelly Gannon CLERK OF THE DISTRICT COURT By: Melissa Conklin Deputy Clerk Published in the Adams County Record on March 14, 2012 March 21, 2012 * March 28, 2012 * April 04, 2012 April 11, 2012 & The Continued from front page having so successfully ridded the park of them, so they continued kill- ing elk." "In the late 1960s, local hunters began to complain to their congressmen that there were too few elk, and the congressmen threatened to stop funding Yellowstone. Killing elk was given up as a response, and then the population of the elk increased exponentially. With the rapid increase in the number of elk, the condition of the land again went downhill quickly. The destruction of the landscape affected many other animals. With the wolves gone, the population of coyotes increased dramatically, which led to an extreme decrease in the number of pronghorn antelope. However, the increase in the elk population caused the most profound change in the ecosystem of Yellowstone after the wolves were gone." Shortly after wolves were reintroduced to Yellowstone, elk avoided river bottoms where they are apparently more susceptible to wolf attacks. Willow growth along streams and rivers began making a recovery after years of over- browsing by elk. Beaver began to re-colonize areas of the park where willows were recovering, in turn creating wetland habitat for a number of other specialist species of plants, insects, amphibians and birds. The shade along the streams provided cooler water that is needed by juvenile fish. This effect is known as a trophic cascade, where a change affecting one species higher up the food chain indirectly affects those lower down. So, it seems obvious that wolves do benefit the ecosystem in places like Yellowstone. The issue here, then, seems to be, "Where else is this effect from wolves relevant?" There are few places in the world like Yellowstone National Park, except for other parks where hunting and human activity are limited or prohibited. One would guess this benefit from predation could probably also be seen in wilderness areas or very remote areas where human activity is very limited, if elk numbers would otherwise be over an optimal level. A study, "The Impact of Native Ungulates and Beaver on Riparian Communities in the Intermountain West" by Charles E. Kay, Utah State University, had this to say about elk damaging riparian areas: "Similar wildlife/riparian interactions occur in other Westem national parks, including Rocky Mountain, Olympic, Mount Rainier, Grand Teton, Banff, and Jasper, where ungulates have been allowed to concentrate in wetlands areas. Similar conditions also exist in western Wyoming where large populations of elk are maintained by winter feeding." The study concluded, "While alteration of riparian communities has been most frequently documented on wintering areas, native ungulates can also have severe negative effects on riparian habitats on higher elevation summer ranges." One area where such effects have been noted is in the upper Gallatin River area in Montana. The Gallatin River starts in Yellowstone National Park, and runs northwest, and is a wintering area for elk herds. These large numbers of wintering elk have caused damage to willows along the river. A 2004 study in the upper Gallatin Range of Southwestern Montana concluded, "If similar top-down effects upon vegetation hold true in other regions of North America and other parts of the world where wolves have been extirpated, wolf recovery may represent a management option for helping to restore riparian plant communities and conserve biodiversity." I can't see that elk have ever over browsed riparian areas in places like Adams County. Cattle certainly tend to congregate in, and cause damage to, some riparian areas, which is why you see streams fenced off. Dr. Craig White from Idaho Fish & Game said places like Yellowstone receive millions of dollars to study things like this, but state agencies simply don't have the funding. I put calls in to several Forest Service range and wildlife specialists. The only one I could contact in time for this article was Amy Baumer, the range conservationist for the New Meadow, Ranger District. She hac never heard of elk ovel browsing or overgrazin anyplace in our area. Jim Beers weighed ir on this, asking why th~ managers at Yellowstone didn't maintain lower elk numbers with hunting. But according to the experience there, hunting didn't effectively keep elk out of river bottoms. I have to wonder ff over-brows~ of riparian areas happens in places wher~ human activity occurs. I've never heard of big groups of elk lounging around in creek bottoms for any length of time in our aYea. Are there areas, other than parks, where this happens? I don't know. Of the beneficial "trophic cascade" referred to above, Beers said, "These effects and their relative importance (to humans, or the Yellowstone 'environment') are trifling changes made into mountainous results of an otherwise catastrophic (to hunters, ranchers, rural economies and state governments) venture.". As becomes obvious in studying the issue of wolves, it is often just as much a political/social issue as it is a scientific issue. Whose values take precedence? Since most people live in urban areas, I have to wonder ff a lot of them have an image of rural America, or the West, as being like Yellowstone... or short of this, that it should be like Yellowstone. A number of rural foiks have formed the opinion that these people want everyplace outside of cities to be completely "natural," meaning where humans have no place in the picture. I always go back to life being a matter of balance. Few issues are black and white. In my opinion, this aspect of how wolves might benefit the ecosystem seems like it might have some validity under certain conditions. Whether those conditions are relevant in much of the West, plus outweigh the negative effects on humans seems debatable. Next week, #3: Do wolves have a positive economic impact On communities by bringing in tourist dollars?